QUALITY OF LIFE AMONG DOCTOR OF PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS USING SF-36 SCALE
Keywords:
Academic, Clinical, Physical Therapy , Quality of life, StudentsAbstract
Objective: To assess the life quality amongst undergraduate physiotherapy students by means of Short-form 36 (SF-36) health questionnaire and to contrast variation in quality of life realms among males & females.
Material & Methods: A cross-sectional research was conducted in Islamabad, Pakistan among 145 undergraduate physical therapy students to assess the life quality domains. Demographic proforma and SF-36 health survey questionnaire was used for data collection. Data collection was completed by using convenience sampling. To evaluate scores between males and females an independent-sample T-test was performed.
Results: Mean age of all male students was 22.02 ±1.67 years & female student was 21.09±1.90 years. Highest outcome was noted in the physical functioning (71.66) and pain (67.14), on the other hand low scores was calculated in social functioning (64.46), emotional problems (58.95), physical health (59.71), energy (53.74) and general health (56.45). A notable difference was seen concerning pain domain for males vs. females (76.90±22.33 vs.57.37±23.71; p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study concludes low score between majority domains of quality of life which means quality of life is poor between students. Therefore in coming time more studies should be conducted to recognize the elements linked with poor quality of life in order to establish enhanced health measures to make quality of life better.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Babar Ali, Aqeel Ahmed, Haider Ali, Sonia wali, Shoukat Hayat, Taher Masood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.